Fort Burgoyne Paranormal Investigation – Case Study
On Saturday 27 September 2025, KASE Paranormal carried out a two-team investigation at Fort Burgoyne in Dover, Kent. Working across separate sections of the site and swapping areas partway through, we documented anything that might help answer a simple question: is Fort Burgoyne haunted, and if so, what kind of activity is taking place?
This case study gives a clear, non-sensational overview of how we approached the night, what methods we used, and the most interesting results from our time at Fort Burgoyne.
Note: Access to Fort Burgoyne is through prior arrangement and our investigation was carried out under licence.
Quick Case Overview
Location: Fort Burgoyne, Dover, Kent
Type of site: 19th-century defensive fort built to protect the high ground above Dover and the approaches to Dover Castle
Date: Saturday 27 September 2025
Time: Activity was logged from around 20:41 through to approximately 01:30
Teams on site:
Team A: Dan, Graham, Rick, Sue, Alan, Matt, Lisa, Georgia
Team B: Ben, Jake, Lucy, Sam, Lee, Laura, Carlos
Aim of the investigation:
To carry out a structured, two-team investigation across different sections of Fort Burgoyne, logging timestamps and comparing overlap between teams to identify any repeatable patterns of auditory, visual, physical, or communicative activity.
Most active areas (based on what repeated, correlated, or produced the clearest responses):
Floor-level tunnels and casemate areas (including the route near the boxing gym)
Basement rooms and the ramp/corridor routes
The “Disney Room” area (noted for visible light flicker)
Key findings:
A clear laser grid break that was observed and then replicated under controlled testing, behaving as if something physical passed through the beam.
Whistles reported by both teams in separate areas within about ten minutes of each other.
Repeated cat ball activations on request, supported by short video clips.
Light-based anomalies including motion light activations, grid light pulsing, and visible flickering in the Disney Room.
Spirit communication attempts (Ouija, Spirit Box, Estes Method) producing multiple names and short phrases, with some sessions appearing responsive and structured.
This was a full, structured paranormal investigation at Fort Burgoyne in Kent; KASE Paranormal does not offer public ghost tours.
About Fort Burgoyne
Fort Burgoyne is a major 19th-century defensive fort above Dover, built in the 1860s to protect the high ground near Dover Castle and the strategic port area. Today it is a protected historic site (a Scheduled Monument), with access often tied to managed use and events.
Like many large forts, it contains long corridors, casemates, tunnels, basements, and enclosed spaces where acoustics, airflow, wildlife, and temperature shifts can all complicate an investigation. That is exactly why structured methods, careful logging, and cross-team comparison matter here.
How We Ran The Investigation
To cover more ground without overcrowding any one area, we split into two teams and worked separate sections, then swapped halfway through to see whether similar activity occurred regardless of who was present.
Across the night we focused on:
Casemates and tunnels on the ground level
Basement rooms, ramps, and corridors
Static and motion-lit areas to capture time-stamped visuals
Equipment used
We used a mix of environmental and interaction-based tools:
Motion-activated lights (installed at the site)
K2 meters and EMF tools
RemPod
Spirit Box
Laser grid
Ouija boards
Cat balls
Static cameras and motion sensor camera(s)
Voice recorders and selected apps
Documentation
Both teams logged timestamps for observations.
The aim was to cross-check overlap between teams and areas later, rather than treating isolated moments as “proof”.
Conditions On The Night
Understanding the conditions helps rule out normal causes before anything is classed as unexplained.
Weather and environment
Weather: Cool, humid conditions with light winds and scattered showers late in the evening. The remnants of Storm Gabrielle were still affecting southern England, with unstable air pressure and fluctuating humidity
Temperature: Around 12°C at 6 pm, dropping to about 8°C by 2 am
Wind: Light easterly breeze (around 5–7 mph)
Humidity: Moderate, around 70%
Moon phase: Waxing gibbous, roughly 77% illumination, providing good natural light and visibility
Possible sources of contamination
Echoes and airflow shifts through tunnels, basements, and corridor systems
Wildlife: bats were present in at least one area, and could plausibly explain some sounds
Insects: one reported “tap” may have been caused by a nearby moth
Damp, cold surfaces and temperature drops affecting comfort and sensation over time
We noted all of these factors during the night so we could filter out what was likely environmental before focusing on anything that remained unexplained.
Key Activity By Area
Ground Level, Casemates, And The Tunnels (Team A)
Early activity began before the main sessions were fully underway, particularly around the casemates and the route near the boxing gym.
Key moments logged by Team A:
20:41 (behind boxing gym): Motion light activated with no visible movement.
20:56 (Case Mate 1): The main door opened behind Dan during investigation. It was unclear if it had been fully latched, but it appeared closed before moving.
21:00 (Case Mate 1): Thuds and footsteps heard coming from the tunnel behind the casemate.
21:24 (floor-level tunnels): A whistle was heard, followed by a second whistle heard by multiple team members.
Laser grid break and controlled testing:
21:31: A clear break in the laser grid was observed on a window section (left window, second pane up).
The beam was then tested by walking through it, and the disturbance behaved the same way, which supported the idea that whatever interrupted it behaved like a physical pass-through.
Spirit Communication Sessions And Responsive Equipment (Team A)
Team A ran structured sessions using both communication attempts and simple request-based triggers (cat balls and light grids), aiming for clear, timed responses rather than vague “noise”.
Ouija sessions (highlights):
22:07 (end casemate): Cat ball placed down the tunnel activated repeatedly, often in time with interaction attempts. Planchette moved to U, V, S, and T, pausing noticeably on “V”.
22:26 (Disney Room area): A second session produced more structured communication, including the name “Georgina Redet” and a link to “Headley”, alongside repeated cat ball activations on command (captured in short clips).
Later ground-to-basement transition activity:
00:05 onwards (lower basement): RemPod activated and stayed lit until reset; Spirit Box produced short phrases (“Change,” “Hope you would build,” “In the way of”).
Cat balls continued to activate on request, and a still image was captured on a motion sensor camera for further review.
Basement Rooms, Ramps, And Corridor Routes (Team B)
Team B logged a steady run of sensory experiences, app-based words/names, and sound reports across multiple basement rooms and corridor routes.
Key moments logged by Team B:
20:55–21:20 (Basement 3): Ache in temple reported twice; app produced multiple words and names.
21:16 (Basement 3): A whistle was heard; cold sensation in legs and a smell report were also noted.
21:41 (ramp): Footsteps and a snapping-stick sound were heard behind the team; coughing and voices followed, with names appearing via app.
21:51 (Basement 1): After placing a cat ball, the app produced “What’s that device?”, and a torch switched off unexpectedly.
22:22 (Basement 2): When asked to “drain the grid,” the Spirit Box responded “Draining.”
22:30 (Basement 4): When asked what the room was used for, Laura picked up on the response of “Storage.” Knocks were requested and then received.
00:05 (corridor): Grid light began pulsing; Laura reported seeing a figure run past the casemate rooms outside.
00:50–01:05 (Disney Room): Lights flickered visibly.
01:30 (basement corridor of 4): Estes Method responses included “I’ve already been” and “Get as many people.”
Evidence Highlights
From the whole night, a few pieces of evidence stand out:
Laser grid: A clear grid break observed and then replicated under controlled testing, behaving as if something physical passed through.
Cross-team correlation: Both teams reported whistles within about ten minutes of each other in different areas.
Responsive triggers: Cat balls repeatedly activating on request during structured sessions, supported by short clips.
Light anomalies: Motion lights, grid pulsing, and visible flickers (notably in the Disney Room).
Communication attempts: Multiple names and short phrases captured across Ouija, Spirit Box, and Estes Method sessions.
Where possible, the team tried to replicate or explain these events through normal means. What remained was recorded as unexplained, rather than labelled as proof.
Our Interpretation Of The Activity At Fort Burgoyne
Taking the night as a whole, Fort Burgoyne showed a mix of possible intelligent interaction and broader, repeat-pattern activity.
Indicators of intelligent-style interaction
Cat balls activating repeatedly in-session and on request, including during Ouija work.
Direct, relevant single-word responses in context (for example “Draining” after a request to drain the grid, and “Storage” when asking about room use).
Structured spirit communication attempts producing names and short phrases across different methods.
Residual or cyclical patterns
Whistles and movement sounds occurring in separate areas, reported independently by both teams within close time windows.
Light-based disturbances recurring across different areas (motion lights, grid behaviour, flicker reports).
At the same time, the environment matters. The conditions that night (cool, damp, storm-affected air pressure and humidity) and known contaminants (echoes, wildlife, insects) could explain some experiences and sounds. Our approach is to keep what we cannot confirm in the “unexplained” category, and look for repeatability over time rather than forcing a conclusion from a single night.
So, is Fort Burgoyne haunted?
We cannot claim to have every answer, but this investigation produced consistent patterns across two separate teams, with multiple light and sound events, responsive trigger activations, and communication attempts that were active enough to justify further study.
What This Means For Future Investigations And Events
For teams returning to Fort Burgoyne, the main takeaways from this investigation are:
The strongest activity window appeared to be roughly 21:00 to 22:45, with continued intermittent responses after midnight.
Cross-team timestamp logging was valuable, especially where whistles and movement sounds appeared in different areas within close windows.
Controlled testing helped (for example, the laser grid break being replicated in a way that matched a physical pass-through behaviour).
Environmental factors should always be treated as part of the data set, not an afterthought, especially in large, damp fort environments.
For future visits, we would recommend:
Running dedicated, quiet observation periods in both the floor-level tunnels and selected basement corridors to reduce noise contamination.
Repeating laser grid setup in the same window/area to see whether the behaviour is consistent across nights.
Using small groups with clear questioning during trigger sessions (cat balls, grid, Spirit Box) to keep responses time-locked and easier to review.
Continuing research around any names obtained during communication attempts, using local archive sources where possible.
Thinking About A Paranormal Investigation In Kent Or The South East?
If you’re in Kent or the wider South East and something at home or work doesn’t feel right, you don’t need to wait for it to escalate. A lot of cases start with a simple sense that something is off, and you want a second pair of eyes.
KASE Paranormal carries out private investigations across the region, using a structured approach and providing clear written feedback, similar to the case study above.
A structured paranormal investigation can help when:
You have done sensible checks and things still do not feel right
Several people have had similar experiences in the same rooms
The activity affects your sleep, routines, or willingness to use parts of the house
You want a neutral, respectful team to look at the situation with fresh eyes
KASE Paranormal offers private home and business investigations across Kent and the wider South East. You can read more about how that works here: https://www.kaseparanormal.co.uk/private-investigations
If you would like to reach out, you can:
Use a short contact form to describe what you are experiencing in your own words:
https://www.kaseparanormal.co.uk/contact-usRequest a free chat about your situation in the contact form
Contact us via email: info@kaseparanormal.co.uk
Find us on social media:
You can also read other articles on our blog if you want to think things over before deciding what to do next: https://www.kaseparanormal.co.uk/blog
Whether your house or business turns out to be haunted, quirky, or simply in need of a few practical repairs, you are entitled to answers. If something does not feel right, it is reasonable to ask questions and to ask for help.