Paranormal News This Week: Gozo Ghost Claims, Wyoming Lights and Milwaukee’s Mystery Noise

KASE Weekly editorial illustration headed “SPIRITED AWAY?” with a limestone holiday-home doorway, blue police-light reflections, distant mountain lights and an audio recorder. Topic strip: ghosts, UFO lights and unexplained noise.

The KASE Weekly | 23–29 September 2026

A holiday home, a mountain skyline and a noisy American neighbourhood have supplied this week’s strange reports. In Gozo, an alleged haunting prompted a police call-out. In Wyoming, a witness says puzzling lights have returned. And in Milwaukee, residents heard something that was considerably less soothing than the evening birdsong.

There is plenty here to investigate. The challenge is keeping the events people reported separate from the explanations attached to them. A police report, a distant light and an unsettling noise each tell us something. None comes with its own paranormal certificate.

Police called after alleged ghost encounter at Gozo holiday home

A stay in Xewkija, Gozo, reportedly ended with a group leaving their accommodation and calling for help during the night of 22–23 September. In its 27 September report, Maltese outlet Talk.mt said a police spokesperson confirmed that a report had been received. Its account described four adults and a minor outside the residence when officers arrived, with no injuries reported.

The allegations are striking: a voice, a shadow beneath a door, appliances apparently operating by themselves and a man claiming an unseen assailant threw him against a bed. These are the group’s reported experiences, not events the police have publicly verified as supernatural.

There have also been developments beyond the initial account. On 28 September, Malta Daily reported, citing unnamed sources, that police had closed the case and passed it to the Curia, the Church’s administration. The outlet said it had sought a response from the Curia. That is an attributed report, not a published finding from either institution.

The same day, Malta Daily reported that Malta Paranormal and Gozo Paranormal Investigations had offered to investigate with the owner’s permission. An offer is not a completed investigation, and there are no findings from that proposed work to assess yet.

The KASE take

The call for help deserves to be taken seriously. That means establishing what frightened the occupants, rather than deciding in advance what caused it.

We would separate the accounts before the witnesses compared every detail, build a timeline and check the doors, appliances, lighting and access to the property. A sound heard on waking and an oven door moving are different observations. They should not be bundled into one explanation simply because they happened in the same house.

The public material we reviewed contains no independently authenticated recording establishing the alleged attack or object movement. It also does not justify calling the witnesses dishonest. For now, the strongest established element is that an incident was reported to police. The identity of any supposed intruder, living or otherwise, has not been established.

Wyoming witness reports the return of mountain lights

Cowboy State Daily’s report, dated 26 September, describes Jezriah Krubeck’s claim that lights over Cedar Mountain near Cody have returned after earlier sightings between November and February. The news is the reported recurrence, not a suggestion that every recording was made this week. The filming date of the linked footage is not clearly established in the article.

Wyoming MUFON director Richard Beckwith told the newspaper he could not explain Krubeck’s video. He was more cautious about another witness’s footage discussed in the same report, suggesting a distant aircraft might account for it. Those are separate observations, not two cameras independently confirming one event.

The KASE take

A recurring sighting is useful because it creates a chance to investigate prospectively. Fixed cameras, recorded viewing directions, exact times and a second known observing position would be a much better start than another round of enlarging luminous dots.

Aircraft, drones, satellites and lights on terrain remain possibilities to test against the actual viewing geometry. We would not rule them out merely because a short recording does not visibly show a flashing light. Nor would we infer an object’s distance or size from brightness alone.

The important distinction is between a witness saying a familiar explanation does not fit and an investigation demonstrating why it cannot fit. We have not independently analysed the original video files. What makes this report interesting is the prospect of repeatable observation. If the lights keep appointments, somebody should bring a tripod and a clock.

Milwaukee’s strange noise gets a very earthly evidence check

Reports published on 23–25 September described an intermittent screech heard in Milwaukee on Monday 21 September. That earlier event date matters: this week’s news is the local reporting and witness interviews, not a fresh noise every time the story is reposted.

IBTimes UK, drawing on WISN’s reporting, described residents hearing the sound across the south side for roughly two hours. The emergency-management office reportedly ruled out its own siren system. That narrows one possibility; it does not identify the source.

There is a further wrinkle. A Reddit post dated 25 September claims to have found the source and sampled it into music. We could locate that claim but could not verify its proposed identification. It would therefore be premature to sell this as either a solved case or a mystery that nobody has answered.

The KASE take

The useful question is what produced the sound and how it travelled. Machinery, amplified audio and reflected sound are sensible avenues to examine. They are hypotheses, not a diagnosis made from the headline.

An investigator would compare original recordings from known positions, note their times and test any proposed source against the actual sound. If listeners think they hear words, we would first ask people to describe it without suggesting a phrase. Otherwise the caption can end up doing half the listening for them.

This is an interesting environmental mystery with an unverified follow-up claim. It is not evidence that something supernatural was shouting across Wisconsin. The night may have been strange; the investigation should remain pleasantly boring.

What this week tells us

The Gozo account needs careful witness work and property checks. The Wyoming report offers an opportunity to collect better observations if the lights recur. Milwaukee is a reminder to check what happened after the first mysterious headline, including claims that somebody has already found an answer.

Curiosity gets us to the case. Good records let us do something useful once we arrive.

Which would you investigate first, and what single piece of evidence would you want before forming an opinion?

Hero artwork is an editorial illustration, not a photograph of the reported property, witnesses or encounters.

Sources and further reading

Gozo

Wyoming

Milwaukee

Next
Next

Paranormal News This Week: Bigfoot Bounty Fine Print, Pentagon Files and Tehran Lights